by Rose T. Dunn, MBA, RHIA, CPA, FACHE
Why are physician practices reluctant to code all conditions? I still see physician offices submitting claims with only four diagnoses (sometimes fewer).
The limitation of linking four conditions to a test or service has been interpreted by some providers as a limit on the number of diagnoses to report. Additionally, some payer systems restrict the number of codes they take from the claim, reinforcing the impression that a minimum number of diagnoses is sufficient.
In the world of HCCs, every condition being assessed should be documented as it may impact the rate of reimbursement. I think there is a real opportunity for coding professionals to engage their physicians in documenting all the conditions they address when they assess a patient. Identifying the lost revenue associated with a skeleton risk adjustment factor (RAF) rather than one that is fully populated with all the conditions the physician is treating is an effective way to make the case for improving the quality of documentation from your providers.
I’d be interested in hearing from physician practice coders on how they encourage providers to fully and completely document all conditions seen when assessing their patients. How do you deal with the situation of under-documenting?
Introduction to HCC Coding
Complete and accurate coding for Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) presents an opportunity for improved data quality and appropriate reimbursement. Learn how from nationally recognized HCC expert, Rose T. Dunn, MBA, RHIA, CPA, FACHE.